Topics:
Leadership,Strategy
May 2, 2019
Overseeing the Development of a Culture of Ideas
May 2, 2019
Enthusiastic employees who understand their mission and
their customers are the best source of innovation and value creation for any
organization. Tapping into the wealth of information and ideas they provide is simply
good business practice. Not only can employee suggestions for new products and
services positively impact the bottom line, their adoption spreads the message
that every employee can make a difference.
How can boards ensure that management actively encourages
employee innovation from the bottom up? How do successful companies develop a
culture where diversity of thought and initiative is welcomed, and
inventiveness is part of the DNA?
There are hundreds of methods for encouraging employees to
actively take part in problem-solving and the new product development. Every
corporation has different opportunities, but here are a few common denominators
that the board should consider discussing with their management team:
- Hiring.
The board should ask management to take a hard look at the recruiting and
hiring processes in place across the organization. If most of it is mechanized,
how do unusual or “out-of-the-box” candidates break through? Are there
algorithms or automated selection processes that could lead to the loss of
great talent before they can even get in the door for an interview? Ask
management to report on whether or not candidates are given the opportunity to
demonstrate a knack for creative problem-solving. If the candidate evaluation process
is based solely on checklists of experience with no reference to results, the
board might need to suggest an update to the questions that hiring managers are
asking.
- Incentives.
Fostering positive behavior requires incentives. Directors should ask if there
is a mechanism or program in place, such as an employee awards program, to
reward employees financially for innovative ideas and problem-solving. They
might also ask management about metrics on incentives and recognition styles
that have worked in the past. Since good ideas are often the result of
teamwork, does the program take into consideration both individual and team
contributions? Are there any other ways these individuals and teams are recognized
for their contributions?
- Pathways.
Smaller organizations can employ “suggestion boxes” and larger ones might use software
applications, email, or file-sharing. Regardless of the method, directors should
ensure that the pathway to successful submission of ideas is communicated
clearly, and responses are sent out quickly. Once an idea is submitted, is the
pathway to review of the idea and its execution laid out? Are ideas cataloged
and maintained for future reference? Most importantly, does the pathway include
resource allocation for implementation?
- Time and
space. Inspiration often seems to come by chance: in the car, in the
shower, at a happy hour, or even on vacation. The key elements are relaxation,
a different environment, and time to allow the mind to wander. When employees
are overscheduled or micromanaged, they rarely generate new ideas. Keeping in
mind that efficiency is not the same as effectiveness, does your organization allow
any built-in “downtime” for thinking or problem-solving? Are managers
encouraged to invite employees to lunch or off-site for discussions or
brainstorming? How would the company review and adopt projects created during
these creative periods?
- Trust.
Employees must be sure that ideas are welcome, or they will shut down. In large
organizations, there is a natural bias against speaking up that must be
overcome, and the board can be an important player in building that trust. If
management is not openly encouraging feedback and opinions in meetings, most
people will avoid expressing new ideas. Even “bad” ideas often lead eventually to
good outcomes, so open discussion and brainstorming sessions that withhold
judgement are best for idea generation. After all, the board would likely say
the same for building the trust necessary to express diverse opinions with one
another—and to voice disagreement when it’s necessary to do so. Why wouldn’t
the same be said for employees at every level, and especially when they are
expected to be creative? In order for the board to understand how trusted
employees feel by their management team, an annual employee survey—hosted by an
outside organization—can help. By digging into the results of an annual survey,
the board and management can gain insight into the employee experience and
whether or not employees feel their ideas are valued, and then track success
metrics over time to understand what’s working—and what’s not.
In the end, all of these concepts are about the freedom for a company’s employees to experiment and the value that could come from that creative expression. Along the path to innovation, employees must feel free—and trusted—to test, explore, and follow through on executing their new ideas.
The creative process is not linear, and not all ideas or prototypes will be adopted. So long as the innovation pathway includes a place to store and review lessons learned, every innovation can be considered a success, even if it does not make it to market. And the board has an important role to play in ensuring that the right culture is in place to see its employees’ ideas come to life.